



|

When emotions are not encouraged and not
expressed
Mel
saw himself as a good husband and provider for the family. He worked long
hours and was not home very much, which added to the already feelings of
loneliness that his wife, Jenny, felt from Mel not being emotionally
available. As much as Jenny tried to ask Mel to show her more love and
attention, he would be too busy or give some excuse. Jenny resigned
herself a long time ago to give up trying to get more love from Mel.
Since Mel was a good provider, Jenny wondered if she had a right to
complain about her situation. To get through the day, Jenny would
often put aside those thoughts and focus her energy on trying to be the
best mom she could be to the kids.
Mel
saw his rules and discipline for the home as a source of love and security
because he did not know how to give love through a compassionate,
heartfelt relationship. The girls loved their dad and wanted to do what he
said, but his stern approach had always made it difficult to talk with
him, which put a big strain on their relationships. Because of the
emotional distance Mel felt with his girls, he believed the rules would
keep the girls safer and bring a closer relationship with his daughters.
“I’m only doing this because I love them,” he would often say.
Over the years, the girls felt dad’s rules were too restrictive and his
enforcement of the rules came with a heavy price. The girls gave in
to dad’s demands because there was no talking to him about it, and they
knew they would never win.
These
rules would be the fuel that ignited the arguments between Mel and Jenny.
The girls would often go to Jenny to argue their point whenever Mel
lowered the hammer on anyone’s request to bend the rules. This
usually disappointed and hurt the girls since they felt they could not
freely express feelings or share what was on their mind. Jenny could see
how the girls were hurt when Mel would tell them to go to their room when
they were upset or going to cry. When Mel blamed Jenny for
interfering with his discipline, he would make subtle little digs that
would be hurtful to Jenny. When Jenny tried to stand up to his unjust
comments or extreme discipline, Mel would make stinging comments that were
like verbal bullets that penetrated Jenny’s heart. As a result,
Jenny would back down, shutting off her thoughts and emotions.
Over
the years the girls and Jenny tucked their feelings inside, not realizing
the devastating toll each cutting word, disappointment, or hurt had on
their heart and soul. What you need to understand is that Mel was
accustomed to the unemotional, strict life that he forced on everyone
else. However, Mel’s emotionless living was like a cancerous
tumor, hidden inside, internally destroying any resemblance of a loving,
compassionate family relationship. The years of emotionless living
had shut down Jenny’s heart long ago and conditioned the girls’ hearts
to expect it in future relationships.
Rules
and logic vs. relationship and emotion
If you live in a
situation similar to Mel and his family, there is always this underlying
caution or emotional distance with the unemotional person. When a
family member is angered by the strict rules or hurt by the lack of
tenderness, the unemotional person shows little sensitivity. The comments
(or silence) from the unemotional person ultimately makes others feel they
are wrong to express feelings or give an opinion. This way of treating
people usually becomes the “normal” way of living for the unemotional
person, which reinforces the belief he or she is always right. This
belief hinders the unemotional person’s ability to see how they hurt
others, even if someone points it out. This treatment destroys the
foundation of a relationship. When emotions are not part of a
person’s life, similar to Mel, you relate more through rules and logic
rather than a relationship. If someone is hurt, showing compassion,
tenderness, and empathy rarely happens since he does not have the capacity
to use feelings to connect with the other person. Discussions will center
on the facts of what and why something happened rather than a sensitive
conversation to understand how the person is feeling or dealing with the
problem. When you are unemotional, giving out rules and discussing the
facts becomes your way to relate, rather than showing affection and
compassion as a way to encourage a trusting relationship. The more
others follow your rules and talk about facts, the more you believe you
have a close relationship.
Forced
respect vs. loving respect
In a home like Mel and Jenny, the
family members are expected to comply with the rules, through
performance and consequences rather than working through issues together
with acceptance and compromise. This is the difference between what I call
forced respect and loving respect. Forced respect
is when the unemotional mate expects (or demands) other family members to
comply with rules and verbal commands or else face the consequences.
Because there is no emotional connection in the relationship, the
unemotional mate believes there is a relationship when the family member
complies with the rules or commands. When the daughters complied
with his rules, Mel believed he had a good relationship with them.
However, the strict rules only created more distance and fear between Mel
and the other family members.
On
the other hand, loving respect is when you first have a loving
relationship with the family members and they comply because of the love,
acceptance, and respect they receive in the relationship. With loving
respect, you are given far more love than you are given rules or
discipline. As a result, even if your relationship includes
discipline, such as, timeouts, limits, groundings, etc., you do not feel
as hurt because you already know deep inside that the discipline is done
out of love. You see, forced respect is based on rules which force someone
to comply out of fear. Where loving respect is based on loving
someone to the point they will be motivated to comply because they feel
loved and do not want to disappoint you.
Living
in a black and white world
Living in a world of black and
white is typically a by-product of a childhood that consists of hurtful,
compassionless, restrictive, and/or abusive caregivers and experiences.
It can also come from growing up in a home with rigid rules or strict
religion with little praise and love. The more you interpret the world in
black and white, the more dependent you are on rules and facts to help you
relate with others. You will rarely let your guard down and you are
determined to be right about everything, lacking humility in the process.
You hurt others by either not talking to them or being brutally honest
with them. The more you interpret the world in black and white, the less
room there is for negotiations or compromise, with no emotion involved in
the decision-making process. If someone disagrees with you, your
argument will leave little opportunity for discussion. In other words,
people cannot win with extreme black-and-white thinkers. Everything
is, “right or wrong,” “yes or no,” or “my way or no way.”
This
narrow-mindedness is often seen in positions of high responsibility or
authority. As a result, the status of your position and/or knowledge
allows justification of your hard-line stance since you cannot relate any
other way. If you are a religious black-and-white thinker, you may utilize
your status and your knowledge of scriptures as a weapon to get a point
across. For example, when someone disagrees or has an opposite opinion,
the black-and-white thinker would have little discussion except to respond
with a scripture to prove you wrong. Even if you had a correct and
valid point of concern, you are made to feel you are wrong to express your
feelings or opinions, while you leave feeling worse than when you entered
the conversation.
As
a black-and-white thinker, you are blinded from seeing your own extreme
thinking and strongly justify your position because you do not like to be
corrected. You need to know where you stand on every issue of life because
you do not want to be wrong or caught off guard with any decision. This
way of thinking also creates the need to control people and situations
because you would never want to be left without knowing what is going on.
Filling
emotional emptiness
If you are like
Jenny or the daughters, you may be living in the same type of house,
feeling alone and shut out from any sense of meaningful relationship.
Because of this, you become frustrated and disappointed from your repeated
failures to have any significant interaction with the unemotional person
and the chance to fulfill your dream of a loving relationship and close
family. In order to survive, you resign yourself to the family
struggles and squelch your feelings by consuming yourself with other
activities. When there is no satisfaction from your relationships at
home, the desire to fill the emotional emptiness is what lures family
members to find meaning in other areas of life. When you pursue
other activities outside the family, those activities become your
substitute for what a meaningful relationship should be accomplishing.
For example,
you may spend more time away from the family or specifically away from the
unemotional mate in activities such as: work, religion, reading, other
relationships, telephone conversations, sleeping, child care, internet
surfing, computer games, shopping, television viewing, and recreational
sports. These are the most common, accessible, and justifiable
alternatives to relationship fulfillment since these activities are
usually already in your life. When these pursuits become excessive,
there is a decay of the emotional, physical, and spiritual union with the
spouse and family. The warning signs that your pursuits are becoming
unhealthy are when you become excessively consumed in other pursuits to
the exclusion of spending time with your mate or family. It is often
the case when family members are feeling an excessive amount of
loneliness, hurt, anger, or fear from the home situation; they feel
justified in spending excessive amounts of time in these activities.
Excerpt
from the book, When Your Mate Has Emotionally Checked Out ©2006
By
Craig Miller Visit, www.feelingsbook.com
For more information or help, please call:
MASTERPEACE Center for Counseling and
Development
308 S. Maumee Street, Tecumseh, MI 49286
·
517-423-6889
·
www.mpccd.com

|